TX: Council on Sex Offender Treatment (CSOT) Ethics Committee Agenda for June 9

R H

Source: hhs.texas.gov

This meeting will be webcast. Members of the public may attend the meeting in person at the address above or access a live stream of the meeting at https://texashhsmeetings.org/HHSWebcast. Select the tab for the Winters Live on the date and time for this meeting. Please e-mail Webcasting@hhsc.state.tx.usif you have any problems with the webcasting function.

This meeting will be conducted via videoconference call in accordance with the requirements of Texas Government Code Section 551.127. The member of the Ethics Committee presiding over the meeting will be physically present at the location specified above.

Read more details

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

🤔 I wonder if they will discuss the ethics of a public Sex Offender Registry as well as the many myriad rules, restrictions, requirements and regulations that accompany the Registry. 🤨
(Yeah no, probably not.😒)

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

FYI. This committee is opposed to residence and proximity restrictions.This committee has also pushed to clarify certain aspects of the statutes adopted by the legislature.

In Texas the problem is more the legislature, the governor and the elected judges. All these people want to be re-elected so they push the tough on crime feel good laws.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

I am disheartened that no one on any committee mentions that registrants are being murdered. This doesn’t seem to be a good reason for the registry to be made law enforcement only. So, how can anyone speak to ethics when this is occurring more frequently than ever? Of course I live in Oklahoma which has very strict requirements. Yet, we just had the tragedy happen in Henrietta with the murder suicide. IS THIS NOT PROOF THAT THE REGISTRY DOESNT WORK?

1
Reply

Every government that runs Registries is a criminal operation. It is quite humorous that they would have an ethics committee related to “sex offenders”. Quite a joke that isn’t very funny though. They probably should be audited and get it figured out why they have no ethics.

Vote out big government lovers. De-fund big government and their harassment. Do anything possible to burn their resources and make them dysfunctional. Don’t limit that to their “sex offender” idiocy.

1
Reply

Why isn’t there more lawsuits against texas sex offender registration?

0
Reply
View Replies (1)